Hi Daniel,
lloda skribis:
>> We should keep the manual in sync with docstrings in bytevectors.c.
>>
>> Thus, my suggestion would be to not insert comments and footnotes about
>> R7RS in the existing sections, but instead to do that in the new section.
>
> Following this, I've removed the footno
Hi Ludovic,
thanks for the review. Second version attached.
> We should keep the manual in sync with docstrings in bytevectors.c.
>
> Thus, my suggestion would be to not insert comments and footnotes about
> R7RS in the existing sections, but instead to do that in the new section.
Following t
Hi Daniel,
lloda skribis:
> Right now the manual just mentions (scheme base), but not the contents. This
> patch at least makes sure that at least the bytevector-related R7RS functions
> appear in the index.
>
> The patch documents a first group of purely bytevector functions and a second
> g
Hi
Right now the manual just mentions (scheme base), but not the contents. This
patch at least makes sure that at least the bytevector-related R7RS functions
appear in the index.
The patch documents a first group of purely bytevector functions and a second
group of binary I/O that are not else
