Hi,
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
something, no?
The implementation they have (which they call a demo) reimplements the
entire reader from scratch. There are several problems
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
something, no?
The implementation they have (which they call a demo) reimplements the
entire reader from
Hi!
My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
something, no?
And there as also this preliminary patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-03/msg00129.html
What about applying first, then one above, then anything beyond?
Ludo’.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
something, no?
The implementation they have (which they call a demo) reimplements the
entire reader from scratch. There are several problems with this, the
worst of which is that it
57a4ae1eb7f58103574525c7e727ff08d44f18ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:09:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Implement SRFI-105 curly infix expressions.
* libguile/private-options.h: Add SCM_CURLY_INFIX_P macro, and increment
SCM_N_READ_OPTIONS.
* libguile
,
Mark
From 4102fbbd852d2f36e13f0c7f10dbac2017552bff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:09:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Implement SRFI-105 curly infix expressions.
* libguile/private-options.h: Add SCM_CURLY_INFIX_P macro, and increment
