Hello,
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder whether this is a useful benchmark. 1.54 mb is small compared
to the 2mb L2 cache of a core duo. I think it's best to look
at tests that exercise a larger working set.
You're right. These are not GC benchmarks anyway, but I wanted
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 05/11/2008, Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
is not currently available on-line but
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
Hello!
heap size (MiB) execution time (s.)
Guile1.54 (1.00x) 6.316 (1.00x)
BDW-GC, FSD=32.41 (1.57x) 4.943 (0.78x)
I wonder whether this is a useful benchmark. 1.54 mb is small compared
to the 2mb L2 cache
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
Hello!
I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
is not currently available on-line but I'd be happy to push it somewhere
(would Guile's repo at Savannah be a good
On 05/11/2008, Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
is not currently available on-line but I'd be happy to push it somewhere
(would
