Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: > > Just a note -- your work here is really appreciated! I know I'm a > vey async with patches but your work is indeed appreciated, > especially in the run-up to a 2.2.0 when I hope to have handled most all > these bugs. And

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: > > On Tue 20 Dec 2016 23:58, Matt Wette writes: > >> With the patch below I can get through all the tests on my Mac (macOS >> 10.12.2) if I use default flags (i.e., -g -O2) and gcc-4.9 (now verifying >>

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

On Tue 20 Dec 2016 23:58, Matt Wette writes: > With the patch below I can get through all the tests on my Mac (macOS > 10.12.2) if I use default flags (i.e., -g -O2) and gcc-4.9 (now verifying > also w/ gcc-6.2). The patch is a hack to > get around an apparent

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Just a note -- your work here is really appreciated! I know I'm a vey async with patches but your work is indeed appreciated, especially in the run-up to a 2.2.0 when I hope to have handled most all these bugs. Andy On Mon 12 Dec 2016 02:25, Matt Wette writes: > On

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

On Sun 11 Dec 2016 16:42, Matt Wette writes: > I am building on my Mac running macOS 10.12.1, aka Sierra. I will post my > patches when I get through “make check”. > > Patches to date attached. These address > 1) #23870 no clock_getcpuclockid > 2) #24682 mkostemp > 3)

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 10, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Matt Wette wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Daniel Llorens wrote: >> >> Make check is failing on test-language, so I will be chasing that down. >> >> >> FWIW this is the only test that fails on

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 7:00 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo > > wrote: >> >> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. >> >> Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. > > Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will eventually become the > 2.2 release series. We encourage you to test this release and provide > feedback to

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 16, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Christopher Allan Webber > wrote: > > Matt Wette writes: > >>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette wrote: >>> >>> OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. >>> >>> I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Matt Wette writes: >> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette wrote: >> >> OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. >> >> I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I believe, >> and I see the same behavior. >> >> >> If I compile with gcc 6.2 or

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. > > I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I believe, > and I see the same behavior. > > > If I compile with gcc 6.2 or gcc4.9, but no extra flags

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I believe, and I see the same behavior. If I compile with gcc 6.2 or gcc4.9, but no extra flags besides —prefix, I get the following failure: FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Make check passes all tests on x86-64 Fedora 24. Freja Nordsiek On Dec 13, 2016 2:25 AM, wrote: > > Matt Wette wrote: > > > > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On Dec 11, 2016, at 7:17

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Matt Wette wrote: > > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > > > > >> On Dec 11, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Matt Wette >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 12, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 11, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Matt Wette > > wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette >> >

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 11, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette > > wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo >> > wrote: >>>

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 05:25:19PM -0800, Matt Wette wrote: [...] > Sorry to keep posting on this. I will stop soon. [this from the peanut gallery: feel free to ignore] Please don't! Even if I don't own a Mac, and even if I'll try to avoid that

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 11, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Matt Wette wrote: > > With patches I can compile and run “make check”. But now I have one > failure:t tests/numbers.test line 1663: (“#i1@-0” 1.0 -0.0). > > This wants the following to produce #t, but it does not: > >

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

With patches I can compile and run “make check”. But now I have one failure:t tests/numbers.test line 1663: (“#i1@-0” 1.0 -0.0). This wants the following to produce #t, but it does not: scheme@(guile-user)> (define z (string->number "#i1@-0")) scheme@(guile-user)> (eqv? (imag-part z) -0.0)

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:16 AM, Matt Wette wrote:On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette wrote:On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5.Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> >> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. >> >> Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will eventually become the >> 2.2 release

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:16 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette > > wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo >> > wrote: >>>

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

On Dec 10, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Daniel Llorens wrote: > > >>> Make check is failing on test-language, so I will be chasing that down. > > > FWIW this is the only test that fails on 10.9.5 and the backtrace looks > identical too. The problem appears in

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

On 10 Dec 2016, at 18:00, guile-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 05:16:08 -0800 > From: Matt Wette <matt.we...@gmail.com> > To: guile-devel@gnu.org > Cc: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> > Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta) > Messag

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> >> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. >> >> Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will eventually become the >> 2.2 release

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Matt Wette writes: >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> >> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. >> >> Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will eventually become the >> 2.2 release series. We encourage you to test this release and

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

> On Dec 7, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.5. > > Guile 2.1.5 is the fifth pre-release in what will eventually become the > 2.2 release series. We encourage you to test this release and provide > feedback to