El El mié, 1 feb 2017 a las 19:56, Eli Zaretskii escribió:
> > From: Germán Diago
> > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:18:28 +0700
> > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > Well, provided that you are tied to msys and you can never ever compile
> guile with a microsoft
Germán Diago writes:
> 2017-01-31 22:29 GMT+07:00 Eli Zaretskii :
>
>>
>>
>> Not my place to answer that, but let me just say that I didn't have
>> any problems using the present autotools-based build system on
>> Windows with MSYS. The absolute majority of
> From: Germán Diago
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:18:28 +0700
> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
>
> Well, provided that you are tied to msys and you can never ever compile guile
> with a microsoft compiler, that
> is ok. You are talking only about your use case. The reality is
2017-01-31 22:29 GMT+07:00 Eli Zaretskii :
>
>
> Not my place to answer that, but let me just say that I didn't have
> any problems using the present autotools-based build system on
> Windows with MSYS. The absolute majority of the problems I needed to
> solve while working on the
> From: Germán Diago
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:28:50 +0700
>
> 2. Windows works under POSIX. What would be the effort of doing a port to
> native windows threads? Effort in
> man-hours?
I've built native Windows port of Guile 2.0.x, you can find the
binaries here:
Hello everyone,
WARNING: I cannot commit to any of the work below but I would try to do a
build system port if that makes sense.
I have been trying guile for a while lately (again). So far, so great!
Congratulations for this amazing piece of software. I am interested in
making real use of it in