Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 22:36:17 +0200 > > >> > * libguile/stime.c (scm_strftime) [__MINGW32__]: Don't use the > >> > trick of appending "0" to the time-zone string, Windows runtime > >> > doesn't support that. > >> > +#ifndef

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sat 23 Jul 2016 15:07, Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andy Wingo >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 14:15:06 +0200 >> >> > * libguile/stime.c (scm_strftime) [__MINGW32__]: Don't use the >> > trick of appending "0" to the time-zone string,

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 14:15:06 +0200 > > > * libguile/stime.c (scm_strftime) [__MINGW32__]: Don't use the > > trick of appending "0" to the time-zone string, Windows runtime > > doesn't support that. > > +#ifndef __MINGW32__ > > +

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sat 16 Jul 2016 13:24, Eli Zaretskii writes: > From f55f1e8de40b38cc745a930bf5a374c73d3c67ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:22:06 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix 'strftime' for MS-Windows > > * libguile/stime.c

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Fri 22 Jul 2016 12:21, Eli Zaretskii writes: > Ping! Two out of 3 patches sent here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-07/msg00085.html > > are still waiting to be accepted. I pushed the basename/dirname patch, using dirname-lgpl from gnulib as Ludo had

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sat 16 Jul 2016 17:37, Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andy Wingo >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:39:23 +0200 >> >> I think the right thing here is to use the mkostemp gnulib module >> instead and pass O_BINARY in the flags. I have made

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Fri 15 Jul 2016 21:04, Eli Zaretskii writes: > The issues with dirname and basename, for which I posted a patch here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-07/msg00012.html > > were subsequently discussed, but the code was not changed, AFAICT. I think we

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
Ping! Two out of 3 patches sent here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-07/msg00085.html are still waiting to be accepted. Thanks.

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:39:23 +0200 > > I think the right thing here is to use the mkostemp gnulib module > instead and pass O_BINARY in the flags. I have made this change in > git; please let me know if it causes problems for

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-16 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sat 16 Jul 2016 13:24, Eli Zaretskii writes: > diff --git a/libguile/filesys.c b/libguile/filesys.c > index 48232e8..c47c2f4 100644 > --- a/libguile/filesys.c > +++ b/libguile/filesys.c > @@ -1472,6 +1472,14 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_mkstemp, "mkstemp!", 1, 0, 0, >SCM_SYSCALL (rv =

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:56 +0200 > > > Can these please be applied? > > Sure let's work on it. Would you mind submitting these again, making > sure they apply cleanly to stable-2.0? 3 patches against the current stable-2.0

Re: MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-16 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, On Fri 15 Jul 2016 21:04, Eli Zaretskii writes: > I built Guile 2.0.12 today with MinGW, and to my chagrin found that > some of the patches I sent long ago are still not in the repository. > > Below please find the list of those patches. > > The stime.c patch in this message

MinGW-related patches that were reported in 2014 but not applied

2016-07-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
I built Guile 2.0.12 today with MinGW, and to my chagrin found that some of the patches I sent long ago are still not in the repository. Below please find the list of those patches. The stime.c patch in this message was not applied, although it causes failures in time.test (explained in the