Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-07-25 Thread Rob Browning
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ludovic and other folks in the Guile and Guix communities are > participating in the reproducible builds effort since the first summit. Oh, excellent. (Now that you mention it, I think I remember seeing Guix mentioned, and had just forgotten.) Thanks -- Rob Browning

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-07-25 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Rob, > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> One issue is that “make dist” is non-deterministic because the archive >> contains timestamps; I’m sure there of other sources of non-determinism >> though, because “make dist” was not designed with that in mind. >> >> The non-source byproducts in release

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-07-24 Thread Rob Browning
Ludovic Courtès writes: > One issue is that “make dist” is non-deterministic because the archive > contains timestamps; I’m sure there of other sources of non-determinism > though, because “make dist” was not designed with that in mind. > > The non-source byproducts in release tarballs are: the

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-21 Thread Neil Jerram
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 22:56, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > Mark H Weaver skribis: > > > >> I've finished my updates to the NEWS file in preparation for the 2.2.5 > >> release. Feel free to reorganize, edit, or expand on the NEWS entries > >> as you

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-20 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> I've finished my updates to the NEWS file in preparation for the 2.2.5 >> release. Feel free to reorganize, edit, or expand on the NEWS entries >> as you think best. I believe that all of the relevant changes are >> listed,

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > I've finished my updates to the NEWS file in preparation for the 2.2.5 > release. Feel free to reorganize, edit, or expand on the NEWS entries > as you think best. I believe that all of the relevant changes are > listed, anyway. Thanks a *lot* for all the

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-18 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic, I've finished my updates to the NEWS file in preparation for the 2.2.5 release. Feel free to reorganize, edit, or expand on the NEWS entries as you think best. I believe that all of the relevant changes are listed, anyway. Note that GUILE-VERSION still needs to be updated. See

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Sure, I can take care of updating NEWS in the next day or two. Awesome, thank you! >>> Regrettably, Guile 2.2 has become too heavy to build on the only machine >>> in my possession that I have any trust in. I don't have a machine that >>> I consider

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-16 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >>> What would you think of releasing ‘stable-2.2’ as 2.2.5? >> >> I think it's a fine idea. > > Awesome. We’ll have to update NEWS; I can give it a go, but if you > could add bullet items for the

Re: Distributed verification of release tarballs using Guix? (was Re: Releasing 2.2.5?)

2019-06-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> What would you think of releasing ‘stable-2.2’ as 2.2.5? > > I think it's a fine idea. Awesome. We’ll have to update NEWS; I can give it a go, but if you could add bullet items for the things you’ve worked on, that’d be great. >>