Re: Java finalization & smobs?

2021-12-10 Thread Maxime Devos
Han-Wen Nienhuys schreef op vr 10-12-2021 om 15:59 [+0100]: > On the one hand, the docs for smobs state "must assume .. all SCM > values that it references have already been freed and are thus > invalid", which suggests that smob freeing happens in random order, > which is consistent with what we

Re: Java finalization & smobs?

2021-12-10 Thread Maxime Devos
Han-Wen Nienhuys schreef op vr 10-12-2021 om 15:59 [+0100]: > We can change our mark routines to avoid the crash, but it's unclear > to us if this behavior is intended or not, and we worry that this > will > come back to bite us in the future. > [...] > [... things about Java-style finalisation

Re: Java finalization & smobs?

2021-12-10 Thread Maxime Devos
Hi, Han-Wen Nienhuys schreef op vr 10-12-2021 om 15:59 [+0100]: > which is consistent with what we see. On the other hand, Guile sets > up > BDWGC with GC_java_finalization=1, which should keep GC dependencies At least in Guile 3, that's done in scm_init_guardians. While that's always called in