Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:48:48 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note that file system procedures
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net skribis:
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:48:48 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must
instead
+
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
CC: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:04:57 +0200
Like (string-match ^[a-zA-Z]:[/\\] (getcwd)) ?
Yes.
But my Git Bash shell on Windows (at work) gives me paths like /drive
letter/...
For example:
On 2014-06-13 17:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
CC: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:04:57 +0200
Like (string-match ^[a-zA-Z]:[/\\] (getcwd)) ?
Yes.
But my Git Bash shell on Windows (at work) gives me paths like /drive
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 06:04:57PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
But my Git Bash shell on Windows (at work) gives me paths like /drive
letter/...
For example:
nj@PC3946 /c/work/icp (master)
$ pwd
/c/work/icp
I think that shell is provided by MinGW/MSYS - so does that mean
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:31:14 -0400
From: Mike Gerwitz mikegerw...@gnu.org
Cc: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org,
guile-devel@gnu.org
My coworkers use MinGW, and it does expose [A-Z]:\ as /[a-z]/; all paths in
MinGW are expected to be Unix-style.
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:37:53 +0200
OK, thanks for the explanation.
Below is the fix I just pushed.
[...]
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:29:24 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note that file system procedures automatically translate
+ ;; /dev/null, so
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:29:24 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note that file system procedures
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:48:48 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note that file system procedures automatically translate
+ ;; /dev/null,
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:48:48 +0200
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note that file system procedures
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:37:53 +0200
OK, thanks for the explanation.
Below is the fix I just pushed.
[...]
+(define %null-device
+ ;; On Windows (MinGW), /dev/null does not exist and we must instead
+ ;; use NUL. Note
On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote:
What’s the name of /dev/null on Windows?
NUL
For example:
C:\Users\njecho hello NUL
C:\Users\nj
Regards,
Neil
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org skribis:
2. c-api.test fails with many messages such as this one:
'CUR' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
This is because c-api.test does this:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net
On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote:
What’s the name of /dev/null on Windows?
NUL
Yes, nul case-insensitively.
From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel guile-devel@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:44:17 +0200
Eli, I noticed there are many other occurrences of /dev/null in the test
suite. Do they all need to be patched to use NUL, or is /dev/null
somehow interpreted correctly in some
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net
On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote:
What’s the name of /dev/null on Windows?
NUL
Yes, nul case-insensitively.
If I remember correctly, even something like
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:46 +0200
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net
On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote:
What’s the name of /dev/null on Windows?
NUL
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:46 +0200
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.homelinux.net
On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:36:22 -0400
From: dsm...@roadrunner.com
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
It still works on modern Windows systems as well.
This was an old msdos batch file trick. There was no way to directly tell if
a directory existed,
But if c:\some\dir\nul existed then
20 matches
Mail list logo
