Hey!
Andy Wingo writes:
> So I would say about this: we can probably deal with it. It's
> unspecified anyway, and is really an edge case.
Agreed.
It's fun to see how the compiler/VM teach me how to write reasonable
code. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo'.
Hi Ludovic,
On Mon 16 Mar 2009 23:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,o interp #t
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define v (values 0 1 2 3))
Here you enter territory that is explicitly undefined by the Scheme
spec (R5 and R6, I think).
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,o inte
