Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis: On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Hans, Hi Ludo, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis: On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48, WDYT? FYI,

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Bruce, Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org skribis: I think it would be Really Nice if it were not fiddling LD_LIBRARY_PATH by the next release. Right, thanks for the reminder. I’ll see where we left it... Ludo’.

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com skribis: And don't forget SRFI-105 ;-D It’s already in. And what about the status of ethread? We were still debating whether to include it, how, etc. So not for this time. Ludo’.

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis: Here are the items from my TODO list that I hope to do for 2.0.7: (and if anyone else wants to do any of these, that would be great!) * Move docs for SRFI-9 records into the Compound Data Types section of the manual, and move docs for the

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Hans Aberg
On 6 Nov 2012, at 19:28, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis: On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Hans, Hi Ludo, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis: On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: I think time has come for

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Price
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Court$(D+2(Bs) writes: * Figure out a way to make Guildhall modules that will be overridden by a matching module in core guile (if it exists). This is important for SRFIs. Ian Price's Guildhall repository contains portable implementions of several SRFIs that

Re: Release time!

2012-11-06 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: * Figure out a way to make Guildhall modules that will be overridden by a matching module in core guile (if it exists). This is important for SRFIs. Ian Price's Guildhall repository contains portable

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: - assertion failure hit when running srfi-18.test in a loop This one turned out to be easy (it could be reproduced by running the sleeping threads notified of abandonment in a loop), and is fixed by 02a362a. Cool! :-) Ludo’.

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread Hans Aberg
On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Hans, Hi Ludo, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis: On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48, WDYT? FYI, this is the last week of November - a lot of

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread Bruce Korb
On 11/05/12 10:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello! I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48, WDYT? I think it would be Really Nice if it were not fiddling LD_LIBRARY_PATH by the next release. By then, we should essentially squash as many bugs as possible. that

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread nalaginrut
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 19:11 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello! I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48, WDYT? By then, we should essentially squash as many bugs as possible. New features we may want to include: - functional setters, for SRFI-9 -

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com writes: And don't forget SRFI-105 ;-D SRFI-105 is already in. Mark

Re: Release time!

2012-11-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48, WDYT? Sounds good! Here are the items from my TODO list that I hope to do for 2.0.7: (and if anyone else wants to do any of these, that would be great!) * Move docs for SRFI-9 records