Hi,
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hi Ludo,
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48,
WDYT?
FYI,
Hi Bruce,
Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org skribis:
I think it would be Really Nice if it were not fiddling LD_LIBRARY_PATH
by the next release.
Right, thanks for the reminder. I’ll see where we left it...
Ludo’.
nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com skribis:
And don't forget SRFI-105 ;-D
It’s already in.
And what about the status of ethread?
We were still debating whether to include it, how, etc. So not for this
time.
Ludo’.
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Here are the items from my TODO list that I hope to do for 2.0.7:
(and if anyone else wants to do any of these, that would be great!)
* Move docs for SRFI-9 records into the Compound Data Types section of
the manual, and move docs for the
On 6 Nov 2012, at 19:28, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hi Ludo,
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think time has come for
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Court$(D+2(Bs) writes:
* Figure out a way to make Guildhall modules that will be overridden by
a matching module in core guile (if it exists). This is important for
SRFIs. Ian Price's Guildhall repository contains portable
implementions of several SRFIs that
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
* Figure out a way to make Guildhall modules that will be overridden by
a matching module in core guile (if it exists). This is important for
SRFIs. Ian Price's Guildhall repository contains portable
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
- assertion failure hit when running srfi-18.test in a loop
This one turned out to be easy (it could be reproduced by running the
sleeping threads notified of abandonment in a loop), and is fixed by
02a362a. Cool! :-)
Ludo’.
On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hi Ludo,
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com skribis:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 19:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48,
WDYT?
FYI, this is the last week of November - a lot of
On 11/05/12 10:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48,
WDYT?
I think it would be Really Nice if it were not fiddling LD_LIBRARY_PATH
by the next release.
By then, we should essentially squash as many bugs as possible.
that
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 19:11 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48,
WDYT?
By then, we should essentially squash as many bugs as possible.
New features we may want to include:
- functional setters, for SRFI-9
-
nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com writes:
And don't forget SRFI-105 ;-D
SRFI-105 is already in.
Mark
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I think time has come for 2.0.7. I suggest scheduling it for Week 48,
WDYT?
Sounds good!
Here are the items from my TODO list that I hope to do for 2.0.7:
(and if anyone else wants to do any of these, that would be great!)
* Move docs for SRFI-9 records
13 matches
Mail list logo