Hi!
On Fri 09 Apr 2010 21:46, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I'm just wondering if it is valid to create a ((void*) 777) pointer.
>> Under what condition is that useful?
>
[...]
> It opens the door to all sorts of crazy things. :-)
Cool :)
FWIW, let's kick th
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 09 Apr 2010 18:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make
>>> sense instead to make foreign pointers of type "void" unsettable?
>>
>> Not necessarily. See t
Hi,
On Fri 09 Apr 2010 18:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make
>> sense instead to make foreign pointers of type "void" unsettable?
>
> Not necessarily. See the test that was added:
>
> (pa
Hi,
Andy Wingo writes:
> You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make
> sense instead to make foreign pointers of type "void" unsettable?
Not necessarily. See the test that was added:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(pass-if "fore
Hi Ludo,
You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make
sense instead to make foreign pointers of type "void" unsettable?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
