On NetBSD/i386 2.99.15:
gdt 51 ~/SOFTWARE/GUILE/guile/guile-core > ./autogen.sh
find: -not: unknown option
This is in guile-scripts/render-bugs, and changing it to ! works.
(I'm guessing that '-not' is a GNU find extension, rather than in POSIX.2.)
I have what I think are adequate tools, but Ne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> My original motivation was to implement "position recording" in
> `guile-reader'. In order to be compatible with the built-in reader, I
> wanted to use the same mechanism as the one it uses. When I initially
> implemented it (not knowing about the re
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> And I was surprised to see that this wouldn't work on any kind of
>> non-immediate. [...] Right, source properties are not "one size
>> fits all" and should only be used by the reader. Perhaps we should
>
If you have time, could those of you who have committed changes to 1.6
(since 1.6.7) check out a current 1.6 tree, look over the output of
cvs -qz5 diff -u -r release_1-6-7
and make sure that all of your changes have appropriate NEWS entries?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you put up the output of 'make dist'.
Certainly -- see my next message.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
_
For now it's available here:
http://people.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/guile-1.6.8-rc0.tar.gz
Please test. This file isn't likely to become the actual release, but
it's probably close.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 =
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have time, could those of you who have committed changes to 1.6
> (since 1.6.7) check out a current 1.6 tree, look over the output of
>
> cvs -qz5 diff -u -r release_1-6-7
>
> and make sure that all of your changes have appropriate NEWS entries?
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are two bug fixes by me, but I don't think they merit NEWS
> entries. (Bug fixes don't normally, do they?)
The general rule I've heard is that NEWS should include "user visible
changes", but of course that leaves a lot of room for discretion.
I su
