Hi Mikael,
I'm writing directly to you (CC guile-devel) because I believe you
originally implemented the low level traps in eval.c - please correct
me if that's wrong.
I'm thinking about how to implement the ability to skip over the
evaluation of an expression, and providing an easy interface for
On 10/28/05, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing directly to you (CC guile-devel) because I believe you
> originally implemented the low level traps in eval.c - please correct
> me if that's wrong.
No, that's right.
> I'm thinking about how to implement the ability to skip over t
Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are probably more competent to answer the question than me.
:-) Well thanks for your quick response anyway; it's very helpful.
> I wrote that code when I was pretty inexperienced, and the choice to
> allow for the continuation to be saved was p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> (`include' feels like a nice name to me. It could be implemented
>> using an optional reader arg to load/primitive-load, something like:
>>
>> (include FILE) -> (load FILE (current-reader))
>
> Maybe `load-with-reader' is more explicit, while not a
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is binary compatibility a requirement? I presume this is aimed for
> 1.8, and presumably for 1.8 we'd bump libguile's major version,
> wouldn't we? (Getting into territory I don't really understand ...)
Adding an arg to scm_primitive_load (if that's th
