Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'

2006-03-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, (See [0] for the beginning of this thread...) Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Then perhaps the example that follows is just too much, too trivial. Is it what you mean? Yes. (But fortunately I'm not the final arbiter, so if perhaps

Guile + Boehm GC

2006-03-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi all, Integration of Boehm's GC within Guile was discussed at length in the past, especially back in 2000. Apparently, Han-Wen even got to the point of having an preliminary implementation of Guile that uses it[0]. Unfortunately the URL mentioned there is no longer valid. Han-Wen: Could you

Re: Guile + Boehm GC

2006-03-21 Thread Nic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) writes: Hi all, Integration of Boehm's GC within Guile was discussed at length in the past, especially back in 2000. Apparently, Han-Wen even got to the point of having an preliminary implementation of Guile that uses it[0].

Re: Guile + Boehm GC

2006-03-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Han-Wen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes: it's here, http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen/public/guile/guile-boehm.gz note that this is a patch for the old GC code, before I took a stab at rewriting. The good news is that it looks quite simple! The main changes are located here

Re: Guile + Boehm GC

2006-03-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen/public/guile/guile-boehm.gz note that this is a patch for the old GC code, before I took a stab at rewriting. The good news is that it looks quite simple! The main changes are located here