Re: Updated HACKING

2008-09-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about the following: Guile is a GNU project, let's stick to the good old and widely understood ChangeLog style rather than rolling our own format. Thanks, Ludo'.

Re: [PATCH] Avoid `SCM_VALIDATE_LIST ()'

2008-09-04 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sun 31 Aug 2008 17:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On a tangent, is anyone still seriously considering to run Emacs atop GUILE? (It looks a bit like a travesty if we're trying to accomodate elisp while also trying to follow standards like SRFI-x and RxRS) I think it makes

Re: Updated HACKING

2008-09-04 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 03 Sep 2008 19:35, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about the following: - Provide a description in the commit message, like so: 1-line description of change More extensive discussion of your change. Document why you are changing things. * filename

Re: request reversion regarding scm_i_* removal

2008-09-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: After discussion with Andy on IRC and looking for uses for `scm_i_' in Google's codesearch, I've become convinced that we'd better not make this change in 1.8 so that we don't break existing code. That means reverting these commits:

Re: [PATCH] Avoid `SCM_VALIDATE_LIST ()'

2008-09-04 Thread Andy Wingo
I don't know why I'm answering this, but... On Thu 04 Sep 2008 17:10, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, I remember having a flamewar with RMS about language agnosticism and running emacs on GUILE about 8 years ago, and I don't think we have progressed much since then.