Re: Rename GNU fdisk to GUILE diskutils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:01:41PM -0200, David Pirotte wrote: > Hi Christian, > > > >> IMHO the programming language/compiler a utility is written with is an > > >> implementation detail that should not manifest itself in the utility's > > >>

Re: Rename GNU fdisk to GUILE diskutils

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, Christian Brunello Christian Brunello wrote: Hello everyone, I write because I would like to rename the GNU fdisk package. In the version I am preparing, the program is written in Scheme, using Guile. In this release there will be only the

Re: Rename GNU fdisk to GUILE diskutils

> I'm sorry but I do not agree. Guile is not an implementation detail in > this case. It means that the package is based on Guile. It's like xterm > (a terminal for x window), gnome-terminal (a terminal based on the GNOME > framework) and so on. Hence many users who don't use Gnome won't use

Re: Website translations with Haunt

On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:29:49PM +, ng0 wrote: > pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) transcribed 2.4K bytes: > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 06:15:29PM +, ng0 wrote: > > > My idea was a reimplementation of prep (a text format and html document > > > generator that is capable to include multiple

Re: Rename GNU fdisk to GUILE diskutils

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > I would like to rename the GNU fdisk > > package. ... we consider > >

Re: Rename GNU fdisk to GUILE diskutils

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I'm sorry but I do not agree. Guile is not an implementation detail in > this