Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Though an immediate, like a fixnum or an iflo, is still something
> different from a tagged heap object like a pair, right? So I would
> expect SCM_THOB_P to be a different test, not a drop-in replacement for
> SCM_NIMP, is that correct?
That's right.
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Though an immediate, like a fixnum or an iflo, is still something
>> different from a tagged heap object like a pair, right? So I would
>> expect SCM_THOB_P to be a different test, not a drop-in replacement for
>> SCM_NIMP, is that
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Though an immediate, like a fixnum or an iflo, is still something
> different from a tagged heap object like a pair, right?
I should clarify that in this new approach, a pair is *not* a tagged
heap object. Tagged heap objects are those which have a tag in their
first
Hello,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> IIUC, your plan is to have a different tagging on 32-bit platforms,
>> without fixflos, right? I’m curious to see how much complexity would
>> entail from that.
>
> Yes, although I'm avoiding the term "fixflos" because IEEE
Hi Arne,
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> I don’t understand the implications of this, but I realized that I would
> love to have info about the sizes of different datastructures in Guile.
Sure.
> I recently started measuring how much memory is required for a record
> compared to a list, so I
