Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I doubt you'll ever get any feedback like that. Making something that
> takes advantage of gcc but does no harm in vanilla c89 or c99 is in a
> sense the best of both worlds.
C99 defines `inline', so nothing wrong problem with that. As for C89,
it would
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But that would still bring in a start-stack and so change backtraces,
> so I'd prefer not.
Oh, right.
> I really think with-fluids is the way to go. If you agree, I'll make
> this change in CVS.
Ok, let's go for it! ;-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
__
