On Mar 29, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The configure script tests for socklen_t in
the wrong way. It must do something like I posted some weeks ago.
Oops, that must have gone through to the keeper.
The configure change below might do the rig
On 29 Mar, 2006, at 19:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the very same error. You'll have to edit configure.in and rerun
configure, look here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2006-02/msg00039.html
I mean, run autoconf, of course. Sorry.
_
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The configure script tests for socklen_t in
> the wrong way. It must do something like I posted some weeks ago.
Oops, that must have gone through to the keeper.
The configure change below might do the right thing.
--- configure.in.~1.268.2.4.~ 2006
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-
prototypes -Werror -MT posix.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/posix.Tpo -c
posix.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/posix.o
In file included from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:78,
from /usr/include/netdb.h:86,
from
Hi Bill,
I'd like to see the changes you made (keeping in mind your disclaimer
about "rightness").
Thanks,
Jay
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:12 AM, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
I just checked Fedora Core 5 with gcc 4.1, and it's broken there in
the
same way as in FC4/gcc 4.0.
(On the Mac socklen_t
I just checked Fedora Core 5 with gcc 4.1, and it's broken there in the
same way as in FC4/gcc 4.0.
(On the Mac socklen_t bug, I can pass along the changes I made, if you
want them -- as I said before, they're not "the right thing").
___
Guile-devel
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:
Jay Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In file included from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:78,
from /usr/include/netdb.h:86,
from posix.c:122:
/usr/include/sys/socket.h:99: error: two or more data types in
declaratio
Hi Jay,
line 99 of socket.h reads
typedef __darwin_socklen_t socklen_t;
and this is the problem. The configure script tests for socklen_t in
the wrong way. It must do something like I posted some weeks ago.
A pretty common mistake...
It was decided that the fix is not that important and w
Hi Neil,
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:56 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> The gcc on this machine is:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/guile-core-1.8-20060328$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
I got different results when using gcc 3.3. Can't remember exactly how
different tho :-/
The gcc I no
