On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 23:26 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> I know this is committed already (great work!), but perhaps you might be
> interested in some doc criticism:
Definitely! Patch inline below.
> > +By @dfn{coarser} than @code{equal?}, I mean that for all @var{x} and
I changed this to "we" in
Hi Ludovic,
On Tue 04 Dec 2007 21:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I played with GCC's `__builtin_expect' (patch attached) to provide GCC
> with branch prediction hints in the most obvious situations:
> `SCM_ASSERT'-like macros, `scm_wrong_num_args ()' situations in the
> evaluat
Hey Stephen,
I know this is committed already (great work!), but perhaps you might be
interested in some doc criticism:
On Sat 01 Dec 2007 21:30, Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +As a legacy of the time when Guile couldn't grow hash tables,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an optional intege
Hi Marco,
What follows is a review by an ignorant individual!
On Tue 27 Nov 2007 07:57, "Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch documents the creation of
> a GOOPS class whenever a new SMOB type is
> defined and GOOPS has been already loaded.
Excellent! Would be nice if t
