Re: Plan for 2.0

2009-01-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes: We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Cool! 2. The vm branch. Once the review of master is done, we'll merge vm into master. 3. The ossau-gds-dev branch. This contains some minor improvements to the Emacs interface. After the

Re: vm status update

2009-01-05 Thread Neil Jerram
2009/1/5 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org: Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes: Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though, - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no objection!) No objection

Re: vm status update

2009-01-05 Thread Andy Wingo
Hey hey, On Mon 05 Jan 2009 17:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes: Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though, - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I

Re: Plan for 2.0

2009-01-05 Thread Neil Jerram
2009/1/4 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com: 2009/1/4 David Séverin da...@altosw.be: Hi Guilers, It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd love to see a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme procedures from others,

Re: Plan for 2.0

2009-01-05 Thread David Séverin
Le Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:25:47 +, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com a écrit : 2009/1/4 David Séverin da...@altosw.be: Hi Guilers, It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd love to see a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to

Re: vm status update

2009-01-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Neil, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes: I meant commits like this one: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=9320e9339085b4d004c255eb55619819fe0b3ca2. Another bigger example, by me, is

Re: vm status update

2009-01-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Season greetings hackers! Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes: Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though, - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no objection!) No objection either, but...

Re: vm status update

2009-01-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: Well, there are larger tests, in that the normal test suite passes with VM-compiled code (e.g. ice-9 and all that). Yes, I remember reading that (and that is reassuring!), but I think it's good to have unit tests for the compiler/VM too. And there