Hi!
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
2009/1/15 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com:
Thoughts? On the other hand, does moving to BDW-GC take a lot of this
out of our hands anyway?
From a quick look, it seems the answer to that is yes, and hence
moving to BDW-GC will mean
Hi,
Linas Vepstas linasveps...@gmail.com writes:
So, the real question is -- how many existing guile
apps call scm_init_guile()?
The Evil Empire's Codesearch reveals that yes, a number of applications
use it:
http://google.com/codesearch?q=scm_init_guilehl=enbtnG=Search+Code
This may be
[2. application/octet-stream;
0001-Don-t-try-to-unlock-already-unlocked-heap-mutex.patch]...
With that patch, make check runs successfully.
log at
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/guile/log-200901161104820417000.txt
thanks for the fix.
pgptHd2B37bCL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I dropped into cachegrind, and it tells me thing about scm_gc_mark in a
simple guile -c 1 run:
. void
. scm_gc_mark (SCM ptr)
794,344 {
155,170 = ???:0x00024917 (77585x)
198,586if (SCM_IMP (ptr))
. return;
.
513,038if (SCM_GC_MARK_P (ptr))
.
2009/1/16 dsm...@roadrunner.com:
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote:
scm_init_guile has always been a bit problematic, as it requires lots
of heuristic and OS-dependent code to try to determine where the base
of the stack is. It's never been formally deprecated, but we have
