On Tue 27 Jan 2009 06:52, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes:
I said
(Though, such a scheme would force scm_take_locale_string to become
scm_take_iso88591_string.)
which is incorrect. Under the proposed scheme, scm_take_locale_string
would only be able to use that storage directly if it
Hi Julian,
On Mon 26 Jan 2009 01:27, Julian Graham jool...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe some more advanced Schemers than I can shed some light on the
following:
Well, that's not me, but I'll join you in fumbling for a solution :-)
The levels system is simply a numerical way of encapsulating this
Hi,
I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well?
That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib
depend on guile = 1.8.x.
(Perhaps we can set up a list for patches that get pushed to Guile ?)
Andy
commit 4f7a0504aac215832e99290e31c9944795c5d206
Hi!
Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes:
Gnulib works for me. Bruno is the maintainer of those funcs, so I'm
sure they work great.
Good!
So really the first questions to answer are the encoding question and
whether the R6RS string API is the goal.
SRFI-1[34] (i.e., status quo in terms of
Hello,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well?
That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib
depend on guile = 1.8.x.
Looks OK to me. (Too bad this module isn't documented BTW.) Do you
have example
On 01/27/09 10:07:16, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi John,
I was going over the licenses in Guile-lib, and realized we didn't
really have a declamation of copyright or license to your goops-unit
code.
Your original message was here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user/1728
Can
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
+(define *value-help-handlers* '())
The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as
in `%load-path'.
I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the
system (e.g. when I was proposing %get-stack-depth). I
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Hi,
I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well?
That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib
depend on guile = 1.8.x.
I have no objection to that.
(Perhaps we can set up a list for patches that get
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as
in `%load-path'.
I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the
system (e.g. when I was proposing
Hi all,
Minor nit about the libguile/inline.h header:
I typically compile with g++ ... -Wundef -Werror, which catches uses of
undefined preprocessor tokens:
/usr/local/include/libguile/inline.h:57:31: __APPLE_CC__ is not defined
In file included from /usr/local/include/libguile.h:114,
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
+(define *value-help-handlers* '())
The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as
in `%load-path'.
I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the
system
11 matches
Mail list logo
