Heya,
On Mon 02 Mar 2009 00:48, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
1) It is expected that you don't have tail recursion between
interpreted and VM code.
2) This particular problem manifests itself in that call-with-values
is VM code (when r5rs.scm is compiled).
(The
Hello!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Mon 02 Mar 2009 00:48, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
As for (1), I'm unsure. The issue is that as long as running code with
the interpreter is the default, people may hit this kind of problem,
which is, well, problematic. Now, I have
Hi all,
I've been hacking at the compiler in recent days, separating out
expansion from compilation (currently they are intertwingled, which
produces some bugs), and making GHIL a more simple language, more
amenable to optimization.
I've grown to really like syncase in its psyntax.scm
Howdy howdy,
On Mon 02 Mar 2009 22:55, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
The compiler
recognizes both call-with-values and @call-with-values, so we could just
not compile call-with-values; less nasty, but still nasty, and penalizes
the vm in the
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I understand. I wish that we lived in a world in which (timewise)
compilation + running == interpretation, so we could just do the former,
but that is not yet our world. However both Chez and SBCL have the
former model, so in a software engineering sense it
