Re: ERROR: Stack overflow from 1.8.6 on HP-UX 11.23/IA, 11.31/IA

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:38:09PM +, Neil Jerram wrote: Albert Chin guile-de...@mlists.thewrittenword.com writes: I've built guile-1.8.6 on HP-UX 11.23/IA and 11.31/IA: $ gtar zxf guile-1.8.6.tar.gz $ cd guile-1.8.6 $ ./configure PTHREAD_CFLAGS=-mt

Re: Strange deadlocks in guile

2009/3/14 Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net Stanislav Ievlev stanislav.iev...@gmail.com writes: It's very strange but I see an only one thread. full Backtrace in attach. That is indeed odd. Are you using GDB, and the info threads command, and it lists only one thread? #0

Re: Strange deadlocks in guile

2009/3/14 Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net Stanislav Ievlev stanislav.iev...@gmail.com writes: It's very strange but I see an only one thread. full Backtrace in attach. That is indeed odd. Are you using GDB, and the info threads command, and it lists only one thread? Yes, info threads

Storing multiple values in a single variable

Hello! The implementation of VM-supported multiple values doesn't play well with values-as-structs as in `values.c': scheme@(guile-user) ,o interp #t scheme@(guile-user) (use-modules (srfi srfi-11)) scheme@(guile-user) (define v (values 0 1 2 3)) scheme@(guile-user) (let-values (((a b c

Re: vm merged to master

Hi, On Sat 14 Mar 2009 14:19, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes: - make distcheck fails; looks like because vm-i-*.i not included in the distribution (i.e. EXTRA_DIST). I have not yet poked distcheck, but non-srcdir builds do work as of now. I don't know what the deal with your make

Re: vm merged to master

On Sun 15 Mar 2009 01:01, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes: My autobuild failed this morning (1000Z) during the build phase: I believe this problem is fixed. Please let me know if you find others. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/

Re: Locks and threads

On Sat 14 Mar 2009 15:23, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Still, I would measure the impact on `module-define!' and `module-ref' because that's at least an additional function call. You probably know, but at least in the VM (and I thought in the interpreter too), the locations are

Re: Storing multiple values in a single variable

Hey! Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: So I would say about this: we can probably deal with it. It's unspecified anyway, and is really an edge case. Agreed. It's fun to see how the compiler/VM teach me how to write reasonable code. :-) Thanks, Ludo'.