Re: srfi-18 and the vm

¡Hola! Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it didn't show any strange errors. Yy!

Re: Sting abstraction 2

On Wed 20 May 2009 17:24, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes: I've been working on the Unicode problem in Guile, and I had been too ambitious. I hacked it up pretty harsh and started getting errors that were tough to debug. Anyway, I backtracked a bit. FWIW this has happened to me a number

Re: srfi-18 and the vm

On Fri 22 May 2009 17:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: ¡Hola! Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test

request review: syncase-in-boot-9

Hey folks! The syncase-in-boot-9 branch puts syntax-case expansion at the heart of Guile -- as the default expander, all Guile Scheme code would run through it; and as the first pass of the compiler, it analyzes all Scheme code, producing typed output. It makes syntax-rules and syntax-case