On Aug 28, 2010, at 15:20, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> Unfortunately this applies to some internals of the implementation too.
>> For example, "set-object-property!" and friends use a hash table and
>> assoc lists internally.
>
> Fixed, thanks.
>
>> scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning and scm_c_register_ext
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 07:26:06 pm you wrote:
> On Sun 15 Aug 2010 06:26, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> > Probably for some interesting applications there will be a hughe
> > demand on memory. And Keeping the redo tree slim can have a great cost
> > benefit. I believe it is possible to
Hi Ken,
On Sat 21 Aug 2010 17:57, Ken Raeburn writes:
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:56, Andy Wingo wrote (quoting the manual):
>> Thus, you need to put in additional synchronizations when multiple
>> threads want to use a single hashtable, or any other mutable Scheme
>>object.
>
> Unfortunately t
Heya Daniel,
On Sat 21 Aug 2010 07:38, Daniel Kraft writes:
> from my point of view, I'd be glad if you replaced the old tutorial with
> my version
I have done so on the web site, thanks.
> (and included it into the source distro / manual -- feel free
> to do the copyright assignment and licen
On Wed 18 Aug 2010 15:27, Mark H Weaver writes:
> In my case, the problem was that I had set PKG_CONFIG=true while running
> configure. I did this because it was recommended by the README in the
> section on setting the BDW_GC_* variables.
>
> Perhaps that was David's problem as well?
Perhaps!
Hi Stefan,
On Wed 11 Aug 2010 14:35, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> The special thing with this situation is that you may fill up your entire Ram
> with continuations so it would be nice to compact them tree wise and also
> facilitate reasonable fast execution deducing the state before exe
On Sun 15 Aug 2010 07:57, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> Attached is my take on adding SRFI 27 "Sources of Random Bits".
>
> Nice! Looks good to me. Could you also add a node to
> doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi?
Yes, looks quite good to me!
Just a
On Sat 14 Aug 2010 09:12, Andreas Rottmann writes:
> Some smallish fixes to the (rnrs ...) modules.
Applied, thanks.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Sun 15 Aug 2010 06:26, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> Probably for some interesting applications there will be a hughe
> demand on memory. And Keeping the redo tree slim can have a great cost
> benefit. I believe it is possible to save like 4x in space. And
> certaily 2x if guile was on a
