On 8 Mar 2011, at 23:37, Andy Wingo wrote:
Everyone appears to want gensymmed names. OK! Let's consider this to
be a bug, and that at some point in the future, Guile will start
gensymming this names.
I want a syntax that allows one to explicitly choose which macro-bound
variables to
Hi,
Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
So, this should go under:
#if GUILE_VERSION 20 // anything after 2.0, e.g. 2.0.1 ??
Rather use AC_CHECK_FUNC.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
On Wed 09 Mar 2011 10:33, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
I want a syntax that allows one to explicitly choose which macro-bound
variables to export, but otherwise, they should never be visible outside
the macro (i.e., be uninterned). When exported, they will just have the
name
Greets,
On Wed 09 Mar 2011 11:07, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
So, this should go under:
#if GUILE_VERSION 20 // anything after 2.0, e.g. 2.0.1 ??
Rather use AC_CHECK_FUNC.
You'd have to check for (ice-9 eval-string) as well, added at the
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sun 06 Mar 2011 23:26, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
The expansion of `define-inlinable'
On Sun 06 Mar 2011 23:27, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I’ve pushed a variant of this patch.
Sorry for the delay in responding. There was actually a more general
fix. I pushed the following on top of your patch:
commit df1297956211b7353155c9b54d7e9c22d05ce493
Author: Andy Wingo
On Tue 01 Mar 2011 20:20, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
Daniel Llorens d...@bluewin.ch writes:
I tried to look into SCM_VALIDATE_REAL per the comment, I didn't get
far.
Yes, SCM_VALIDATE_REAL (defined in validate.h) requires that the tested
value be an inexact real, i.e.
On Thu 03 Mar 2011 18:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Do Fedora co. move ‘.so’ to dev packages too?
Yep.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Thu 03 Mar 2011 14:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
I wonder how this generally should be handled -- I think the most
appropriate way would be to commit any changes that can go into the
stable release into stable-2.0 (only), and then,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
SCM_NUMBERP, SCM_NUMP, and SCM_INEXACTP ought to be deprecated, and
replaced with internal versions.
OK, but in master only please.
Yes, of course, makes sense :)
They check only for representations
supported by the core implementation, and do not
10 matches
Mail list logo