Hi Andy,
Sorry for the late reply.
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I have a branch that fixes literal matching to actually compare toplevel
bindings, as the RNRS suggest, rather than simply assuming that a
literal that is not lexically bound can be compared symbolically.
(Recall that
Hello,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Here’s an updated patch that strictly checks for ill-formed UTF-8
sequences, as Mark pointed out. It passes all the tests I recently
added to ports.test.
I committed it, though Mark rightfully noted on IRC a non-conformance
issue. I’ve added a
On Fri 06 May 2011 14:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Sorry for the late reply.
No prob; thanks for thinking through it!
So, with this change, no top-level binding of ‘else’ is /required/, but
/when/ there is one, it prevails over the literal, correct?
Sorta? This language is
Hi,
Just wanted to chime in and tell you a little about what I'm doing with the
guile-unify package.
First off, this is a tool to do backtracking effectively e.g. tree searches
and make heavy use of
dynamic variables.
There is three activities ongoing.
1. type-checking examples
2. first
Cool!
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to chime in and tell you a little about what I'm doing with the
guile-unify package.
First off, this is a tool to do backtracking effectively e.g. tree searches
and make heavy use
