Re: redoing SCM representation in 2.2

2011-05-19 Thread Ken Raeburn
On May 17, 2011, at 14:59, Mark H Weaver wrote: But the question I was after was, even if we want to use the full range of the values, do we need the entire set to be representable *in immediate form*? I doubt the very largest and smallest values are used often, so making just those values

can't use variable in sxml-match?

2011-05-19 Thread nalaginrut
hi guys! I got a problem when I using sxml-match. Let me describe it more briefly: Begin= (sxml-match cl [(http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom:content (@ (type ,tv)) ,cv) ...do something... [,otherwise #f])

Re: can't use variable in sxml-match?

2011-05-19 Thread nalaginrut
Sorry, there's a typo caused huge misunderstand in IRC. Let me fix my letter: Begin= (sxml-match cl [(http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom:content (@ (type ,tv)) ,cv) ...do something... [,otherwise #f]) ===End==

Re: can't use variable in sxml-match?

2011-05-19 Thread Ian Price
Hi guilers, Just a note to say that we found a solution to nalaginrut's problem on IRC. (lambda (mypattern) ;; Instead of testing the head of the pattern in the sxml-match, I ;; have moved it out to here. (let* ((new-tag (if (equal? mypattern (car cl)) 'success

Re: can't use variable in sxml-match?

2011-05-19 Thread nalaginrut
Hi guilers, Just a note to say that we found a solution to nalaginrut's problem on IRC. (lambda (mypattern) ;; Instead of testing the head of the pattern in the sxml-match, I ;; have moved it out to here. (let* ((new-tag (if (equal? mypattern (car cl))