Hi all,
I just fixed a long-standing memory leak in Guile 2.0. (I say that like
I'm proud or something, but of course I was the one the introduced it in
the first place!)
See c05805a4ea764dec5a0559edefcdfb9761191d07 in stable-2.0 for the
gnarly details. The summary is that applicable smobs were
On Fri 16 Mar 2012 19:44, Neil Jerram writes:
> Except... that there does now seem to be a significant problem with
> master's compilation time. In practice this is now taking so long that
> it has no chance of completing (on my build machine) within a day.
> Hence for now I'm going to disable t
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to mension three projects that I've been working on lately
> (as some of you alerady know)
>
>
> https://gitorious.org/guile-syntax-parse
> ---
Hi,
Trying to implement with-contract I would like to mod define into a new
variant
depending on if the symbol is a contracted variable or not, if it's a
contracted
variable one should translate the define according to
(deifne f/contracted val)
->
(define-values () (begin (set! f/contracted val)
Hi,
I have an ideom that I wouldlike to model more clenaly. currently in
guile-contract you
do
(contract-out-spec spec (f (-> symbol? symbol?)))
(define (f x) x)
...
(contract-out spec)
This way we f will be exported using the contract (-> symbol? symbol?) e.g.
it has to accept a symbol
Hi,
It is possible to get syntax location information via syntax-source, but
trying to implement
something like
(define-syntax syntax/loc
(syntax-rules ()
((_ src stx)
(let ((ret (syntax stx)))
(set-syntax-source ret (syntax-source src))
ret
I fail due to not ident
Hi,
I just wanted to mension three projects that I've been working on lately
(as some of you alerady know)
https://gitorious.org/guile-syntax-parse
This is racket's syntax parse ported over to guile. It works now so well
that I released
a
