Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-05-25 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200 2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go there first. If it's a build fix or some other fix related to forward-compatibility with 2.0, it can go on 1.8 as well. We should avoid adding interfaces to

Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-05-25 Thread Andy Wingo
On Fri 25 May 2012 10:53, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes: http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc-xfer-2012-05-25.tar.xz It contains documentation for 17 ice-9 modules, plus some macros (see README). I hope it can be useful for Guile 1.8+ maintenance. Super! You interested in

Removing ‘GC_PTR’

2012-05-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ken Raeburn raeb...@raeburn.org skribis: Is GC_PTR defined as void* in 6.8? If so, the patch to remove GC_PTR would still work. Though a configure test could probably be written to test whether the libgc header defines GC_PTR. I agree we can remove it: in stable-2.0 it’s no longer used

Using labels-as-values on MacOS X

2012-05-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ken Raeburn raeb...@raeburn.org skribis: * Don't use addresses of code labels with LLVM, even if the compiler supports them. At least with the version of LLVM GCC on my Mac (gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.1.00)), Damn, what compiler is this? It’s

Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-05-25 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Fri, 25 May 2012 14:48:19 +0200 You interested in submitting this as a patches to Guile? Not really. The documentation is necessarily Guile 1.4-specific, requiring reconciliation in both content and style for best 1.8+ fit. I think Noah Lavine is in a better