Hello!
On 05/29/12 at 03:54pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi!
Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com skribis:
Hm, this is weird. So TeXmacs seems to bundle the same eval.scm as guile has
(among others)?
You mean TeXmacs ships a file called ice-9/eval.scm? If that is the
case, we’re in
Hi,
Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com skribis:
Texmacs complains when started:
snip
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 7 [boot-closure #t #catch-closure 420e600 ...]
?: 6 [catch-closure]
?: 5 [boot-closure #t #catch-closure 4b59180 #catch-closure 4b59160]
?: 4 [catch-closure]
Hello!
Commit b22e94db7c91d7661204e33f3bc2bfead002c9b7 adds
‘%default-port-conversion-strategy’, a natural friend of
‘%default-port-encoding’.
First, I’m wondering whether ‘port’ should be part of the name, given
that it’s also referred to by ‘scm_stringn’ co. It’s good to have it
in the name,
Second, in commit 9f6e3f5a997f484548bd03e7e7573c38a95c8d09, I changed
string ports to honor it, like other port types, instead of forcing
'error. This seems like the right thing to me, for the sake of
consistency (in fact, I’d consider the previous behavior as a bug), but
it’s an observable
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Nala Ginrut nalagin...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, speaking this. I have a question that, is there any convenient
way to add multi-backend in Guile?
It depends on what you mean by that.
You can add as many low-level languages as you like, including a GCC
interface,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hello!
Commit b22e94db7c91d7661204e33f3bc2bfead002c9b7 adds
‘%default-port-conversion-strategy’, a natural friend of
‘%default-port-encoding’.
First, I’m wondering whether ‘port’ should be part of the name, given
that it’s also referred to by
