Why not specify the logic in scheme and output it either to C or Assembler
:-)
/Stefan
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
But the used sbcl derivative although not gnu is either in the public
domain
or bsd so we should be able to publish
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not specify the logic in scheme and output it either to C or Assembler
:-)
That sounds very cool, and would be very cool, I thought first, but
then I realized that you wouldn't be able to bootstrap
Yes this can be an issue.
On a second thought guile do have an initital interpreter that is either a
vm or a native no?
Perhaps one can make use of that somehow!
/Stefan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Krueger keen...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
On a second thought guile do have an initital interpreter that is either a
vm or a native no?
Perhaps one can make use of that somehow!
Yeah, I thought about that too, but thought first that it would be
Hmm, yes then it can work.
I would compile only to C at the first phase as you say as it should not be
of too high
complexity to output the C part and be pretty swift although you are
interpreting. Then the VM can compile all guile including code to emit and
compile assembler and then one can add
Hi,
Daniel Krueger keen...@googlemail.com skribis:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not specify the logic in scheme and output it either to C or Assembler
:-)
That sounds very cool, and would be very cool, I thought first, but
