Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-07-11 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com () Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:29 -0400 What do you think? WRT style, the texi imported from 1.4 is littered w/ ‘@twerpdoc’, ‘@twerpmacdoc’ and ‘@twerpcommentary’ comments. IWBN to filter them before committing. WRT content, IIRC 1.4.x (ice-9 calling) was

Re: Guile build failure

2012-07-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, David Pirotte da...@altosw.be skribis: This was using stable. No I didn't try the tarball, but since you asked i just did and did in 2 different locations: /opt [no nfs] and /usr/local/src [uses nfs] and make check passes on /opt but fails on /usr/local/src So the problem seems to

Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-07-11 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes: I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready to apply to stable-2.0. Cool. I applied the first one. When applying the rest, I

Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-07-11 Thread Noah Lavine
Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I believe the second patch from earlier should work.) I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines. Noah On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM,

Running non-scheme scripts: some thoughts

2012-07-11 Thread Ian Price
Hi, Though guile is really a multi-language vm, it does not provide a simple way to run scripts for languages other scheme from the command line. I think we should add a --language switch that takes a mandatory argument, and use that to determine the language. Other solutions for dealing with

Re: Running non-scheme scripts: some thoughts

2012-07-11 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Though guile is really a multi-language vm, it does not provide a simple way to run scripts for languages other scheme from the command line. I think we should add a --language switch that takes a mandatory

Re: Running non-scheme scripts: some thoughts

2012-07-11 Thread Krister Svanlund
Personally I would think that having Guile guess by extension would be the, in most cases, most reliable. Otherwise there could be problems loading several files in different languages etc. I would think that one of the best solution would be to have a switch to execute arbitrary commands such as

Re: Running non-scheme scripts: some thoughts

2012-07-11 Thread nalaginrut
Personally I would think that having Guile guess by extension would be the, in most cases, most reliable. Otherwise there could be problems loading several files in different languages etc. Yes, my vote is gussing by extension. But also provide an option --lang to specify in case the

Re: Running non-scheme scripts: some thoughts

2012-07-11 Thread William ML Leslie
On 12 July 2012 13:12, nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I would think that having Guile guess by extension would be the, in most cases, most reliable. Otherwise there could be problems loading several files in different languages etc. Yes, my vote is gussing by extension. But