Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com wrote: However, it leads to an edge case in Guile 2.0 where disabling autocompilation leads to the module-loading C code path going

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi David, Thanks for the note. I must confess I’m slightly skeptical about the chances of success of this approach. However, I’m happy you’re trying, and the fact that you take a principled approach, with the various syntactic extensions defined separately seems great to me. Please let us know

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread David A. Wheeler
Ludovic Courtès Thanks for the note. I must confess Im slightly skeptical about the chances of success of this approach. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. However, Im happy youre trying, and the fact that you take a principled approach, with the various syntactic extensions defined