David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com writes:
I'd really like for there to be a common spec for Scheme with libraries,
etc., and my hope is that R7RS will be that spec.
Call me a cynic, but if r6rs couldn't do that, then I don't see how r7rs
could be given that it actively avoids many
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi Stefan!
stefan.ita...@gmail.com stefan.ita...@gmail.com skribis:
1 I don't think the current equal? Will need to change, but
Another one that under rnr7 will be coded and used with the
Symbol equal? In that module. Hence no problems.
Yes, of
I said:
I'd really like for there to be a common spec for Scheme with libraries,
etc., and my hope is that R7RS will be that spec.
Ian Price:
Call me a cynic, but if r6rs couldn't do that, then I don't see how r7rs
could be given that it actively avoids many important portability
Hi all,
The rtl native environment is close to a usable state for linux x86-64.
Most instructions have been translated to assembler and it remains to debug
them
and write test cases which will take some time.
Consider the simple code,
(define (f n)
(let loop ((n n) (s 0))
(if (eq? n 0)
The cycle detection for a tree would probably look something like,
SCM scm_equal_cons(SCM x, SCM y, SCM slow, int move)
{
SCM res;
if(scm_is_pair? (x) scm_is_pair (y))
{
if(scm_is_eq (x, slow)) cycle_detection_hit();
if(move)
if(scm_is_pair? (SCM_CAR (slow)))
Hi,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com skribis:
The cycle detection for a tree would probably look something like,
Tortoise-and-hare would have to be applied to arbitrary data structures, AIUI.
Ludo’.
