Hello all,
Last night, I encountered what I consider to be a frustrating limitation
of GOOPS methods: They do not support record type descriptors, only
classes. This makes it difficult to take advantage of generic
procedures without also buying into the rest of the GOOPS system.
Here's some
2014-10-21 16:57 GMT+02:00 Dave Thompson dthomps...@worcester.edu:
Hello all,
Last night, I encountered what I consider to be a frustrating limitation
of GOOPS methods: They do not support record type descriptors, only
classes. This makes it difficult to take advantage of generic
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Panicz Maciej Godek
godek.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
As I managed to find out, the (define-record-type t ...) also introduces a
GOOPS class named t. Following your example, you'd need to define your
method in the following way:
(define-method (foobar (foo