Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > On a more general topic, IIUC Artanis is not an “application” but a > library so maybe it is not a good idea to include it in (index-page) > since it uses the term “applications using Guile“ (The same problem will > apply to

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

Hi, Nala Ginrut writes: > Hi folks! > Our new main site really rock, right? > > I believe that we may add more to "Applications using Guile". > Here's mine, the entry of GNU Artanis. I think it would be a great idea to include Artanis in Guile's website. >>From

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

In connection with this thread I have kept crude notes on announcements of guile-based libraries and packages announced on guile-user. Here is the list. If there is some format that should be used I can update, but the community may want to edit want says and what goes. Let me know how I

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

Hi Matt, > In connection with this thread I have kept crude notes on announcements of > guile-based libraries and packages announced on guile-user. Here is the > list. > If there is some format that should be used I can update, but the community > may > want to edit want says and what goes.

GNU Guile 2.1.1 released [beta]

We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.1. This is the first pre-release of what will eventually become the 2.2 release series. It provides many improvements, most notably in speed: it starts up faster than Guile 2.0, runs your programs faster, and uses less memory; see below for full

Re: Mark procedures

Good post! I first like to second the need for our own gc. Regarding mark procedures. I prefer that we collect the use cases and make sure that the framework can handle them in a robust and effective way. I don't like to write mark procedures at all and your fixes seam to address quite a lot of

Re: Mark procedures, LilyPond, and backward compatibility

Hi Andy, Thanks for the detailed analysis of the problems with mark procedures. Andy Wingo writes: > At the end of our IRC conversation yesterday you put the burden on me to > argue against mark procedures, which was fair, but at this point I think > we would need good

[PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

Hi folks! Our new main site really rock, right? I believe that we may add more to "Applications using Guile". Here's mine, the entry of GNU Artanis. Attached the patch. Happy hacking! >From e6b323352382898b570e81c9f43b970c3facb1a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nala Ginrut

Mark procedures

Greetings Mark! And hello to guile-devel :) Sorry for being incommunicado in these last months. The good news is that we're finally ready to release 2.1.1, yay! I'll be easing myself back into the mailing list soon but I wanted to expand on a topic we discussed over IRC yesterday: mark