Re: Attempting to unbox struct fields

Hi David, "Thompson, David" writes: > Here's a patch I came up with to enable (and fix where necessary) the > support for signed integer and double struct fields. Great, thanks for working on it! This is not a proper review, just a couple of questions and comments. >

Re: Attempting to unbox struct fields

Here's a patch I came up with to enable (and fix where necessary) the support for signed integer and double struct fields. Am I on the right track here? Thanks, - Dave From 8bde5c7018fde91cc7140777107bacfb3febb170 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson Date:

Attempting to unbox struct fields

Hello wingo and list, A couple days ago on #guile, I started a conversation about optimizing some record types I use for linear algebra to take advantage of unboxed arithmetic in the upcoming Guile 2.2. Andy informed me of a temporary hack I could try, but then said that The Right Thing is for