That was funny, just spent an hour trying to figure out what was wrong
with my letrec when it was really that there's no explicit in-order?
in the external representation anymore.
0001-Update-documentation-to-reflect-new-tree-il-external.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 01 Aug 2010 20:44, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
I've spotted an issue with your fix: the way 64-bit random numbers are
generated in scm_random() is bogus;
Grr, indeed. Fix applied, thanks.
Would
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Michael Lucy michaelgl...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question about module namespaces: I have some syntax that I'd
like to be available to code generated by macros in my module, but
which I'd rather not export to the user (to avoid clobbering their
functions).
I'm getting this not-so-helpful message from vars-bind-list in
module/language/tree-il/compile-glil.scm. I've started at this for
awhile and I still don't understand what's causing it. Here's the
smallest test case I could construct that triggers it if this is at
all helpful:
Lua: function
I'd like to patch Guile's math functionality to expose M_PI, modf, and
probably other things as well. Before I started I thought I'd ask --
would such a patch be accepted? And is there any policy on where they
should go? It seems a little crass to clutter up the (guile) namespace
any more, but I
Hi, yes that was part of a patch Andy approved but I never committed
the second part due to issues.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi!
No Itisnt theseaisinhere+...@gmail.com writes:
commit d26a26f6c0fbdb971995d1b3dcf3345831eb12d7
Author: No Itisnt
See [PATCH] Allow printing of malformed tree-il
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:09 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, yes that was part of a patch Andy approved but I never committed
the second part due to issues.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote
Looks good; a couple of comments inline. If you want to kill trailing
whitespace, though, please do that as a separate commit, without any
functional changes
How do you reconcile that with 'delete-trailing-whitespace?
Here we should produce a warning, I think, even if we are
permissive.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Michael Lucy michaelgl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for the status report!
Michael Lucy michaelgl...@gmail.com writes:
Files I've added so far:
guile/modules/ice-9/peg.scm (I assume this
I've noticed while renovating my parser that it's pretty common for
unwanted values to weasel their way into tree-il. This patch adds an
optional else clause to unparse-tree-il, so when it's told to be
permissive, it will allow non-tree-il values through without error, so
as not to cause errors
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Michael Lucy michaelgl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Is there any scheme expression that will just get ignored when the
scheme code is compiled?
I'm generating some code with a function like:
(define (gen-update-ab updatea updateb)
`(begin
,(if updatea
ping -- could someone take a look at this?
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:37 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
+/lib/c++defs.h
+/lib/iconv.h
+/lib/netdb.h
I don't see these in my tree
So where would they come from? Obviously I'm not an autotools pro.
autoconf (GNU Autoconf
Hey, now would be a great time for a critique of my Lua project if you
are willing, so I can incorporate any criticisms or ideas you may have
before the GSOC midterm date. I'm closing in on finishing the base
language and I hope to complete it this week if time permits.
Great news. I haven't
Hey, now would be a great time for a critique of my Lua project if you
are willing, so I can incorporate any criticisms or ideas you may have
before the GSOC midterm date. I'm closing in on finishing the base
language and I hope to complete it this week if time permits.
- I am using #nil for
This one is wrong: the file uses mmap(3), which is declared in
sys/mman.h according to
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/mmap.html.
This function is missing on MinGW, though, but there’s currently no
replacement in Guile. Would you like to work on it?
Sorry, I don't
+/lib/c++defs.h
+/lib/iconv.h
+/lib/netdb.h
I don't see these in my tree
So where would they come from? Obviously I'm not an autotools pro.
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.65
automake (GNU automake) 1.11.1
Revised patch attached also.
I was thinking about inlining, contant propagation, and that class of
optimizations recently. Wouldn't Guile's module system (specifically,
module-set!) interfere with doing these optimizations on module-level
bindings? If a binding is inlined, propagated, etcetera, and the
binding was set! by
Couple of questions:
- Right now I've stuffed everything into one file. When it doesn't
recompile automatically (as in I run it without making changes, after
a run that autocompiled it) it can't resolve MAKE-APPLICATION from
(language tree-il) so a bunch of my tests cause errors. Any known bugs
Not a known bug, no. Can you make a test case?
Yes, attached. It appears to happen when (rnrs control) is used. This
is with the latest master commit.
No, it will not. The primitive-ref return thing is a hack; the proper
way to do this (I think?) is to use prompts and aborts, and also enhance
Recently I get a build failure on libguile/guile-procedures.texi:
guile: uncaught throw to misc-error: (dynamic-link file: ~S, message:
~S (libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4 file not found) #f)
Which would appear to be because srfi/ is not yet built. Anyone get
the same problem? I'm not sure how to go
Whoops! Here's the patch
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:45 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I get a build failure on libguile/guile-procedures.texi:
guile: uncaught throw to misc-error: (dynamic-link file: ~S, message:
~S (libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4 file not found) #f)
Which
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
[keeping the list cc'd]
I apologize ; I keep doing that because I'm using this webmail
interface. I really need to set up my email properly one of these
days.
Neat!
Have you looked into libjit? The only reason I bring it up is because
it seems to be more popular than Lightning and already has some
third-party language bindings.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Guile Developers,
After watching the
it won't happen again.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:18 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. Here's a patch that adds (srfi srfi-9 gnu) with
set-record-printer! and adds a subsection to the SRFI-9 part
OK.
s/GUILE/Guile/ and two spaces after and end-of-sentence period.
How so? Two trailing spaces after the period or two newlines?
Is there a style guide somewhere? I was mainly copying and pasting
from srfi-modules.texi.
I’d rather call it ‘set-record-type-printer!’ (it prints records, but
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, No Itisnt theseaisinh...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. Here's a patch that adds (srfi srfi-9 gnu) with
set-record-printer! and adds a subsection to the SRFI-9 part of the
manual for it.
I can go ahead and commit it, if that's OK.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:23 PM
One thing I'm missing, and maybe I just didn't see it, is a way to
define custom printers for SRFI-9 records.
(define-syntax define-record-printer
(syntax-rules ()
((_ name thunk)
(struct-set! name vtable-index-printer thunk
Does something like that already exist? If not, 1) do
Hello, I'm going to be implementing Lua 5.1 for Guile as a Google
Summer of Code under the GNU Project this year. My project is defined
as the Lua 5.1 programming language and standard library excluding
the string, coroutine, and debug modules I left a little bit of
wiggle room in the standard
One option I am really starting to like is LLVM. I know what you're
thinking, huge memory consumption, giant dependency, etc, but it's so
cool! It supports every desktop architecture too.
I have nothing to add except that's very impressive. Did you use any
lexer/parser generators?
Hi, I don't think I can reply on the GSOC site, so I'll put it here
Specifics on your proposal:
* cothreads: Guile's partial continuations can implement this construct well,
and correctly; while it's not necessary, it would be lots of fun. See
Prompts in the manual.
I left it out because
Side note: For those of you who don't follow the libgc list, libgc is
now patched to work with Valgrind. Checkout the CVS version, compile
with -DUSE_GET_STACKBASE_FOR_MAIN and valgrind away.
I'm sorry I wasn't able to contribute anything yet (although I did in
a roundabout way). At the moment
So my grudging thought is, OK. But if I could steer you to finish some
JS things or optimize some Elisp code or work on a Waddell-style inliner
or a Scheme native compiler, these are also interesting and useful
projects :-)
I'm pretty focused on Lua for the summer project at the moment -- I
Boehm GC CVS now has a patch that will fix this behavior. Compile with
threads and -DUSE_GET_STACKBASE_FOR_MAIN. See the following thread for
details.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc/3788
If Hans Boehm agrees, the behavior will probably become default
Here's a program that demonstrates the actual issue at hand.
Basically, libgc finds the stack address from either glibc or the
kernel, which is not what it wants because valgrind messes with the
address space of the host program. This is only on Linux, but I
understand the issue is similar on
I want to apply for GSOC this year. Since Guile has recently obtained
a compilation/language framework, I was thinking that an
implementation of the Lua language for Guile, under the auspices of
the GNU Project, would be a good fit.
A little background on Lua: It has a reputation as an
36 matches
Mail list logo
