Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I guess this 'if' is to avoid an infinite loop if the struct points back
to itself. However, it apparently fails to detect cycles in the general
case.
Yes, indeed.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I guess this 'if' is to avoid an infinite loop if the struct points back
to itself. However, it apparently fails to detect cycles in the general
case.
Yes, indeed.
Here’s an updated patch that uses the ‘depth’
Hi,
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I guess this 'if' is to avoid an infinite loop if the struct points back
to itself. However, it apparently fails to detect cycles in the general
case.
Yes, indeed.
Hello!
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
As incredible as it may seem, ‘hash’ until now always returned 263 % n
for structs, leading to interesting experiences when using structs as
hash table keys.
Yes, do you remember us talking about this long
Hello!
As incredible as it may seem, ‘hash’ until now always returned 263 % n
for structs, leading to interesting experiences when using structs as
hash table keys.
The attached patch provides a simple hasher for structs.
I’ll commit it within a few days if there are no objections.
Ludo’.
Hi Ludovic!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
As incredible as it may seem, ‘hash’ until now always returned 263 % n
for structs, leading to interesting experiences when using structs as
hash table keys.
Yes, do you remember us talking about this long ago on IRC? I wanted to
fix this,
