Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
OK. Still I feel that it would be great to have `compile' and
`compile-file' available in the default environment -- they're in the
same category as `load', `eval', etc. It would also be good for scripts.
But I could be convinced otherwise :)
Not sure I'm
On Wed 25 Feb 2009 22:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The 1.8 results were against the Fedora guile, and the vm results
against libguile/.libs/lt-guile, run inside pre-inst-guile-env.
The issue is that `pre-inst-guile-env' adds overhead, which may not be
negligible when measuring
Hi!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Wed 25 Feb 2009 22:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The 1.8 results were against the Fedora guile, and the vm results
against libguile/.libs/lt-guile, run inside pre-inst-guile-env.
The issue is that `pre-inst-guile-env' adds overhead,
Yo,
On Tue 24 Feb 2009 00:44, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Yeah, dunno. It would be great to have `compile' in the toplevel
environment. OTOH it takes time.
Just to be clear: I wasn't so much concerned about load time, but rather
about namespace pollution and fuzzy dependencies
Hello!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Fri 20 Feb 2009 01:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Do we really need it? Guile `master' doesn't put any autoload in the
global namespace, only in `guile-user-module', thus only affecting the
REPL.
Yeah, dunno. It would be great to
