Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-29 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:49 AM, David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote: Please let us know what youd need to have it implemented within Guile, or, even better, send a patch. ;-) Okay! Since we already have it implemented on *top* of guile, I have hopes that it'll be relatively easy

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com wrote: However, it leads to an edge case in Guile 2.0 where disabling autocompilation leads to the module-loading C code path going

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi David, Thanks for the note. I must confess I’m slightly skeptical about the chances of success of this approach. However, I’m happy you’re trying, and the fact that you take a principled approach, with the various syntactic extensions defined separately seems great to me. Please let us know

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-28 Thread David A. Wheeler
Ludovic Courtès Thanks for the note. I must confess Im slightly skeptical about the chances of success of this approach. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. However, Im happy youre trying, and the fact that you take a principled approach, with the various syntactic extensions defined

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-27 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com wrote: However, it leads to an edge case in Guile 2.0 where disabling autocompilation leads to the module-loading C code path going through a direct C call to the C implementation of primitive-load, a path that

Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-26 Thread David A. Wheeler
All: I'd really like feedback on proposed new SRFIs, and I'd like to help get these SRFIs implemented in guile. Background: The readable group has developed and refined 3 new reader abbreviations for Scheme: curly-infix-, neoteric-, and sweet-expressions. Each builds on the previous one;

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-26 Thread nalaginrut
hi Wheeler! I ever port the sweet-expression as a language module for Guile, and I have such an honor to say it's based on your work. There're still some bugs I need to face. But it works fine already. https://gitorious.org/nacre/guile-sweet Anyway, I'd like to see it becomes SRFIs. I've

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-26 Thread David A. Wheeler
nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com: I ever port the sweet-expression as a language module for Guile, and I have such an honor to say it's based on your work. There're still some bugs I need to face. But it works fine already. https://gitorious.org/nacre/guile-sweet Awesome! Thanks! We've made

Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- sweet-expressions

2012-08-26 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote: nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com: I ever port the sweet-expression as a language module for Guile, and I have such an honor to say it's based on your work. There're still some bugs I need to face. But it works fine