Hi Noah!
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com skribis:
Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off
of my to do list.
Presumably, yes. Could you post the latest version of the patch here
(the previous broke the manual, IIUC)?
Thanks!
Ludo’.
Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off
of my to do list.
Thanks,
Noah
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you
mean that I should remove them in the same
() Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com
() Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:29 -0400
What do you think?
WRT style, the texi imported from 1.4 is littered w/
‘@twerpdoc’, ‘@twerpmacdoc’ and ‘@twerpcommentary’
comments. IWBN to filter them before committing.
WRT content, IIRC 1.4.x (ice-9 calling) was
On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this
documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready
to apply to stable-2.0.
Cool. I applied the first one. When applying the rest, I
Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes
to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I
believe the second patch from earlier should work.)
I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines.
Noah
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM,
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200
2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go
there first. If it's a build fix or some other fix related to
forward-compatibility with 2.0, it can go on 1.8 as well. We
should avoid adding interfaces to
On Fri 25 May 2012 10:53, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc-xfer-2012-05-25.tar.xz
It contains documentation for 17 ice-9 modules, plus some macros
(see README). I hope it can be useful for Guile 1.8+ maintenance.
Super!
You interested in
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Fri, 25 May 2012 14:48:19 +0200
You interested in submitting this as a patches to Guile?
Not really. The documentation is necessarily Guile 1.4-specific,
requiring reconciliation in both content and style for best 1.8+
fit. I think Noah Lavine is in a better
Heya TTN,
Great to have your hack-power here.
On Mon 14 May 2012 19:00, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
Also, i can either add a file to branch_release-1-8 (exercising
my regained write privs :-D), or post it. What's best?
2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go
() Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com
() Wed, 2 May 2012 11:26:22 -0400
Unfortunately, it looks like the changes for these do not have
copyright assigned to the FSF, so we can't use them directly.
Is that correct?
Partially (details below).
Also, I hope this isn't a sensitive
Hello,
The short answer is that the fork (from 2001 or so) was a reaction
to losing repo write privs. Now that i have regained them, i am
interested in merging back the relevant bits, w/ copyright notice
modified to the proper FSF standards. Details up to you...
That sounds great to me!
Hi Thien-Thi,
It would be great if you could help with documenting these modules.
What do you think about copying the doc for these modules from 1.4 to
1.8/2.0? Would you be willing to transfer copyright to the FSF for
that?
If Noah is OK to help with the actual transfer of the doc bits, then
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
The short answer is that the fork (from 2001 or so) was a reaction
to losing repo write privs. Now that i have regained them, i am
interested in merging back the relevant bits, w/ copyright notice
modified to the proper FSF standards.
Luckily, I haven't actually started the rewrite, because I also have
limited time to work on this. So I'm very glad to hear that you're
interested in transfering them. If you are the only author of the
pieces, then I think the transfer is simple - you put the FSF
copyright notice at the top,
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
Luckily, I haven't actually started the rewrite, because I also have
limited time to work on this. So I'm very glad to hear that you're
interested in transfering them. If you are the only author of the
pieces, then I think the transfer is simple -
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 14 May 2012 14:44:17 +0200
What do you think about copying the doc for these modules from
1.4 to 1.8/2.0? Would you be willing to transfer copyright to
the FSF for that?
Sure (see other reply to Noah).
If Noah is OK to help with the actual
Hello,
If Noah is OK to help with the actual transfer of the doc bits,
then I guess we’re almost all set. :-)
1.4 snarfs comments from .scm files for interpolation in template
files to create the final texinfo, but i'm almost certain you
don't need/want that flow, but would rather have
Thanks a lot! I will definitely look at that.
Unfortunately, it looks like the changes for these do not have
copyright assigned to the FSF, so we can't use them directly. Is that
correct?
Also, I hope this isn't a sensitive topic, but why is there a
semi-friendly fork of Guile 1.4? Are there
Hello all,
I was inspired by a recent post about (ice-9 occam-channel) to take a
look and see what modules don't have documentation. I've only looked
at the (ice-9 ...) modules so far, but there are a lot of them. (I
checked for documentation by going to the top-level info node for
Guile
() Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com
() Tue, 1 May 2012 18:26:28 -0400
Does anyone know anything about these modules?
Some of these modules are in Guile 1.4.x, and thus documented.
See http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc/, specifically
the module index, and the parent dir for source.
20 matches
Mail list logo
