On Thu 03 Mar 2011 18:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Do Fedora & co. move ‘.so’ to dev packages too?
Yep.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>>
>>> Another related issue that has come up in IRC is versioning: If I
>>> understand correctly, it is currently impossible to specify the version
>>> of the shared object to be used (as one ca
On 3 Mar 2011, at 14:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The crux is that on older MacOS X versions ‘.dylib’ are shared
> libraries (not dlopenable), whereas ‘.so’ are “bundles”
> (dlopenable). That’s why lt_dlopenext (which is what
> ‘dynamic-link’ uses) doesn’t try to open ‘.dylib’ fil
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> Another related issue that has come up in IRC is versioning: If I
>> understand correctly, it is currently impossible to specify the version
>> of the shared object to be used (as one cannot even pass a full fi
Hi,
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 3 Mar 2011, at 11:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The crux is that on older MacOS X versions ‘.dylib’ are shared
libraries (not dlopenable), whereas ‘.so’ are “bundles”
(dlopenable). That’s why lt_dlopenext (which is what
‘dynamic-link’ uses) doesn’t t
On 3 Mar 2011, at 11:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> The crux is that on older MacOS X versions ‘.dylib’ are shared
>>> libraries (not dlopenable), whereas ‘.so’ are “bundles”
>>> (dlopenable). That’s why lt_dlopenext (which is what ‘dynamic-link’
>>> uses) doesn’t try to open ‘.dylib’ files.
>>
>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> Another related issue that has come up in IRC is versioning: If I
> understand correctly, it is currently impossible to specify the version
> of the shared object to be used (as one cannot even pass a full filename
> to `dynamic-link'). This has two (IMHO)
Hi Hans,
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 3 Mar 2011, at 00:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link
> "/usr/lib/libm.dylib")) ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file:
> "/usr/lib/libm.dylib", message: "file not found"
You should omit the extension,
On 3 Mar 2011, at 00:14, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
message: "file not found"
>>>
>>> You should omit the extension, which will be automatically infer
On 3 Mar 2011, at 00:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
message: "file not found"
>>>
>>> You should omit the extension, which will be automatically inferr
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 21:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
>>> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
>>> message: "file not found"
>>
>> You should omit the extension, which will be a
Hi,
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 21:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
>>> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
>>> message: "file not found"
>>
>> You should omit the extension, which will
On 2 Mar 2011, at 21:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
>> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
>> message: "file not found"
>
> You should omit the extension, which will be automatically inferred by
> Gu
Hi,
Michael Ellis writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define libm (dynamic-link "/usr/lib/libm.dylib"))
> ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: file: "/usr/lib/libm.dylib",
> message: "file not found"
You should omit the extension, which will be automatically inferred by
Guile (actually ltdl) depending
14 matches
Mail list logo
