On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Dale Evans pointed out that GCC runs the autoconf tests twice when
cross-compiling: once for the build machine and once for the host
machine. I suspect that this is the proper
Doug Evans xdj...@gmail.com skribis:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Dale Evans pointed out that GCC runs the autoconf tests twice when
cross-compiling: once for the build machine and once for the host
machine. I
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Doug Evans xdj...@gmail.com skribis:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Dale Evans pointed out that GCC runs the autoconf tests twice when
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
So, should we keep just the c-tokenize.lex part of
8cb0d6d7fa9aaac316c29a64c541336b51b6f93d, and revert the rest?
Sounds good. I did this in 17d4daa8bd11176c2ebe0d35ac48da3d247094ff.
Thanks,
Mark
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Commit 8cb0d6d7fa9aaac316c29a64c541336b51b6f93d build: Don't include
config.h in native programs when cross-compiling. apparently broke
cross-compiling. Madsy on #guile, who successfully cross-compiled
e1bb79f for mingw, ran into this problem with
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Commit 8cb0d6d7fa9aaac316c29a64c541336b51b6f93d build: Don't include
config.h in native programs when cross-compiling. apparently broke
cross-compiling. Madsy on #guile, who successfully cross-compiled
e1bb79f
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Commit 8cb0d6d7fa9aaac316c29a64c541336b51b6f93d build: Don't include
config.h in native programs when cross-compiling. apparently broke
cross-compiling. Madsy on #guile,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I agree that this is fragile and should be reworked somehow, but for
2.0.10, I wonder if we could just revert the part of 8cb0d6d having to
do with gen-scmconfig.c.
What do you think?
You’re right. So for
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
(BTW, we can test cross-compilation to GNU/Linux with
guix build guile --with-source=guile-2.0.9.xyz.tar.xz
--target=mips64el-linux-gnu.)
I tried this on my x86_64 box with guix master (v0.5-355-g9037ea2),
freshly built (autoreconf -vfi, configure, make
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I agree that this is fragile and should be reworked somehow, but for
2.0.10, I wonder if we could just revert the part of 8cb0d6d having to
do with gen-scmconfig.c.
What
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
(BTW, we can test cross-compilation to GNU/Linux with
guix build guile --with-source=guile-2.0.9.xyz.tar.xz
--target=mips64el-linux-gnu.)
I tried this on my x86_64 box with guix master (v0.5-355-g9037ea2),
Hi Ludovic,
Commit 8cb0d6d7fa9aaac316c29a64c541336b51b6f93d build: Don't include
config.h in native programs when cross-compiling. apparently broke
cross-compiling. Madsy on #guile, who successfully cross-compiled
e1bb79f for mingw, ran into this problem with 21a7ba9:
--8---cut
12 matches
Mail list logo
