l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Yes, Valgrind can't cope with libgc, which is inconvenient.
Interesting. That sounds like a shame, but actually I guess it's not
so bad because libgc will remove many of things that make valgrind of
interest to us. Also, in the last resort, we can
Hello,
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Yes, Valgrind can't cope with libgc, which is inconvenient.
Interesting. That sounds like a shame, but actually I guess it's not
so bad because libgc will remove many of things that make valgrind of
Hey!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Startup time seems to be the same, which is good.
I noticed that `subr.bm' runs noticeably faster:
* master
(subr.bm: subr invocation: simple subr 70 total 1.11)
(subr.bm: subr invocation: generic subr 70 total 1.26)
(subr.bm:
Hi Ludo,
On Sun 22 Mar 2009 11:26, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The `master' branch (which contains the VM) was merged into the
`boehm-demers-weiser-gc' branch:
Startup time seems to be the same, which is good. I don't know about
longer runs. I tried to run valgrind on Guile though
