Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-02-03 Thread Neil Jerram
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: Hi Neil, Hi Andy... On Tue 27 Jan 2009 23:10, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes: Not sure I understand... Anything like guile-sources, which we already have? I mean to say, a list that gets a mail whenever something is pushed to master,

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-28 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, On Tue 27 Jan 2009 21:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Looks OK to me. (Too bad [(ice-9 session)] isn't documented BTW.) Do you have example use cases? From (texinfo reflection): (cond ((defined? 'add-value-help-handler!) (define (stexi-help-handler name value)

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: On Tue 27 Jan 2009 21:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Looks OK to me. (Too bad [(ice-9 session)] isn't documented BTW.) Do you have example use cases? From (texinfo reflection): (cond ((defined? 'add-value-help-handler!) (define

pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well? That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib depend on guile = 1.8.x. (Perhaps we can set up a list for patches that get pushed to Guile ?) Andy commit 4f7a0504aac215832e99290e31c9944795c5d206

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well? That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib depend on guile = 1.8.x. Looks OK to me. (Too bad this module isn't documented BTW.) Do you have example

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Neil Jerram
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: +(define *value-help-handlers* '()) The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as in `%load-path'. I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the system (e.g. when I was proposing %get-stack-depth). I

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Neil Jerram
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: Hi, I pushed the following patch to master. Is it OK to push to 1.8 as well? That way I could drop some modules from guile-lib, and make guile-lib depend on guile = 1.8.x. I have no objection to that. (Perhaps we can set up a list for patches that get

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Neil, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as in `%load-path'. I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the system (e.g. when I was proposing

Re: pushed to master: extensibility to (ice-9 session)

2009-01-27 Thread Clinton Ebadi
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: +(define *value-help-handlers* '()) The convention within Guile is rather `%'-prefixed names for globals, as in `%load-path'. I'm not sure about that. I interpret `%' as something to do with the system